The Conversion Agenda

"Freedom to convert" is counterproductive as a generalized doctrine. It fails to come to terms with the complex interrelationships between self and society that make the concept of individual choice meaningful. Hence, religious conversion undermines, and in extremes would dissolve, that individual autonomy and human freedom.

Monday, July 30, 2007

Kerala church warns of second liberation struggle

CPM-Xian honeymoon collapsing
By S. Chandrasekhar

E.M.S. Namboodiripad ministry of 1957, the first elected communist regime in the world, was dismissed by Nehru due to the ‘liberation struggle’ spearheaded by the church and supported by Muslim League and Hindu community organisations like NSS and SNDP. The strategy of Communist Party (then undivided) to take over educational institutions run by the church, provoked the ‘liberation struggle’ which was marred by violent protests, attacks by communist cadres on church believers and death by police firing, of even women and children.

In the run-up to the 2004 Lok Sabha and 2006 Assembly polls, concerted efforts were made by the CPM to woo the Christians (who are traditional UDF/Congress voters), apart from placating Muslim extremist groups like Madhani, JEI, NDF, SIMI etc. CPM leaders like M.A. Baby, Sebastian Paul, Lonappan Nambadan, Thomas Issac, Ninan Koshy etc were specially drafted to establish rapport with the church. Several state meets of the CPM and the Malappuram meet passed resolutions wooing the Christians and Muslims and public acknowledgments were made by Pinarayi, V.S. and Karat, saying they cannot win in Kerala without getting Muslim/Xian votes who form almost 45 per cent of the populace. The church also reciprocated and several churches issued ‘pastoral letters’ calling for voting for CPM/LDF.

Education Minister M.A. Baby repeated the same mistake committed by Joseph Mundassery in 1957. His Self-Financing Colleges Act aimed at controlling, and being under state control, the engineering and medical colleges, predominantly, controlled by the church, evoked sharp protests and violent agitations by the church. The CPM’s monkey brigade, SFI, hit out against the church-run colleges by attacking their offices and vehicles. Finally the Supreme Court struck down the Act, much to the glee of the church.

Now the CPM regime has de-affiliated several colleges, medical and engineering, run by the church, which has threatened a ‘second liberation struggle’ to rid Kerala of communist rule.

The Kerala Bishops’ Council consisting of religions heads of all major church faction like Syro-Malankara Catholic, Roman Catholic, Marthoma, Malankara, Orthodox, Latin Catholic, CSI etc have formed an ‘Inter Church Council for Education’ to unify their agitations. Thrissur Arch Bishop Mar Andrews Thazhath belled the cat first, by reading ‘pastoral letters’ against the CPM’s tactic to infringe on minority rights enshrined in the Constitution. “Nobody will be allowed to destroy education institutions run by the church and any persecution on institutions will be strongly resisted. Taking away rights of appointments of teachers and staff, making Sundays working days and handing over control of church-run institutions to local bodies, will be strongly resisted. If CPM has its way, students will wish each other ‘Lal salam’, ‘Inquilab zindabad,’ totally destroying faith, culture and religions values”, the Bishop thundered. He called upon church followers to even spill blood and sacrifice lives to protect Christianity.

Other Arch Bishops like Mar Joseph Perumthottam, Mar Powathil, Baselious Mar Clemis, Soosapakiam etc have also accused the CPM of claiming to be champions of minorities but stabbing them in the back.

An arrogant Pinarayi Vijayan has asked the church to withdraw protests and pastoral letters. He reminded the ignorant bishops of Pope John Paul-II-Fidel Castro relations!

The bishops have hit back saying Pinarayi language smacks of vengeance and church institution are being hounded. They also said that the CPM of today is not the Communist Party of 1957 which was led by stalwarts like EMS and Atchuda Menon, whose commitment to socialism and Communism was rock-like. They said the CPM cannot bully and bulldoze them to surrender their right to preach through pastoral letters and accused CPM of a ‘hidden agenda’ in destroying the church.

The church has planned massive protests on August 12, all over the state. They are in the process of forming ‘protection and self-defence squads’, a reminder of the 1957 ‘Kuruvadi Sangam’.

Meanwhile, in a severe jolt to the CPM regime, the Supreme Court has passed humiliating strictures on the state asking: What a government are you running? This is based on a petition filed by the church-run and other medical colleges asking central force protection for their admission tests, since SFI mob attacked their exam centres and injured students and teachers. But for the crocodile-skinned CPM, it is dust to be flicked away.

Although, it cannot be disputed that the church-run institutions are denying admission to Hindus, this move of the CPM is fraught with dangerous consequences. If CPM is acting on the church-run institutions, to help Hindus, will it have the conviction to admit that it is essentially a Hindu party? That is the truth, which the CPM feels it is bitter to admit, as it is going after the minority vote oasis, which is only a mirage.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Conversions were never a civilised affair

by M.S.N. Menon

Britain tried to assimilate its non-White population. It failed. Today, it is experimenting with multi-culturalism. It has not made a success of it either.

We are told by Christians and Muslims that they are “superior” to Hindus. Which is why, they say, Hindus are being converted to Christianity and Islam. What is the truth? What is their record in human relations?

Here are some facts. Judge for yourself.

For 1,600 years, the Christian church (European) held on to the belief that the Black man did not possess a soul and that he was the son of the Devil. Even today most of the Christians are not free from such thoughts.

Surely, after this, can we say that they are ready to accept the brotherhood of men? No. Then, why are they busy converting non-Christians to the Christian fold when they are unwilling to treat the convert as a brother?

The “colour problem” has a hoary past. The Bible says that the Black man was condemned to be a slave. This gave legitimacy to the slave trade.

Lord Palmerston, the British statesman, says that slave trade was the worst crime in human history. And both the Whites and Arabs are guilty of it.

America fought a civil war to get rid of the slave trade. And yet a report by former US President Clinton’s Advisory Board on Race Relations lamented that even after 110 years of “equal rights”, the Whites were “ignorant of the nature of the discrimination against the Blacks.” And after four decades of federal efforts at integration, “there were few spaces that Blacks and Whites occupy as equals.”

This makes me raise a relevant question: If the Whites (Christians) of America are unwilling to accept the non-White peoples as brothers and equals, why are they taking the lead in the evangelisation of the non-White world?

Perhaps Britain is the most colour conscious country in the world. “Among us”, writes a British daily, “are those with minds so warped and views so extreme that they will plan and carry out cold blooded murder because of the colour of your skin.” Indeed, many such murders have already been carried out.

Britain tried to assimilate its non-White population. It failed. Today, it is experimenting with multi-culturalism. It has not made a success of it either.

But it is crucial. The West will have to come to terms with the coloured peoples. It cannot reject them without inviting a sharp global response against it.

A multi-cultural society calls for political unity without cultural uniformity. This is not easy to achieve. There is no model to go by. India is the only country which has an incipient model.

But with the White man’s record of intolerance, slave trade, genocide, colonialism, imperialism, holocaust, apartheid, his record of human relations is indeed one of the worst. After this, how can he be superior to the Hindus? Which is why I object to the conversion of Hindus to Christianity. Christianity is a failure.

What about Islam? The Islamists say that they have an unfinished business: To convert the non-Muslims to Islam. Pray, what for? Because Islam is “Superior”? Let us see the record of the Muslims.

The Quran granted them the right to own slaves. The Arabs have been supplying slaves to Europe for a very long time—for as long as 1,300 years, while the European slave trade did not last for more than three-four centuries. Slave-trading was the most flourishing activity of the Muslim invaders in India. Mir Qasim took 60,000 slaves from Sind and Mahmud took 500,000 from Taneswar. These are just two instances.

Arabs were the main suppliers of eunuchs to the Muslim countries, for which children of 4-12 years were castrated. Removal of genitals caused extensive deaths, as much as 90 per cent. The profits were enormous, but the brutality was so great that it came to be called “the hideous trade.” The Ottomans wanted to abolish this trade, but the priests of Mecca opposed the Ottomans.

Conversions were never a civilised affair

Ayatollah Khomeini says: (August 24, 1979): “Islam grew with blood. The great Prophet of Islam carried in one hand the Quran and in the other the sword.” That is how most of the conversions took place. The learned Qazi Mughis-ud-din says on conversion: “Every device short of massacre in cold blood was resorted to in order to convert heathen subjects.” Here is human relations!

I can anticipate the response to this article: “What has all this to do with the present generation of Christians and Muslims? Yes, they are not directly responsible. But they can be honest—they can say that they do not claim to be superior to the Hindus.

Monday, July 16, 2007

Christian activists disrupt Hindu prayer in US Senate

13 Jul 2007, 0312 hrs IST,CHIDANAND RAJGHATTA,TNN

WASHINGTON: Christian activists briefly disrupted a Hindu invocation in the U.S Senate on Thursday, marring a historic first for the chamber and showing that fundamentalism is present and shouting in the U.S too.

Invited by the Senate to offer Hindu prayers in place of the usual Christian invocation, Rajan Zed, a Hindu priest from Reno, Nevada, had just stepped up to the podium for the landmark occasion when three protesters, said to belong to the Christian Right anti-abortion group Operation Save America, interrupted him by loudly asking for God's forgiveness for allowing the ''false prayer'' of a Hindu in the Senate chamber.

"Lord Jesus, forgive us father for allowing a prayer of the wicked, which is an abomination in your sight," the first protester shouted. "This is an abomination. We shall have no other gods before You."

Democratic Senator Bob Casey, who was serving as the presiding officer for the morning, immediately asked the sergeant-at-arms to restore order. But they continued to protest as they were headed out the door by the marshals, shouting, "No Lord but Jesus Christ!" and "There's only one true God!"

Zed, sporting a saffron robe, a rudraksh mala round his neck, and a prominent tilak on his forehead, then nervously went through the invocation chosen from the Rig Veda and Bhagavad Gita.

"Let us pray," he began, "We meditate on the transcendental glory of the deity supreme, who is inside the heart of the earth, inside the life of the sky and inside the soul of heaven. May he stimulate and illuminate our minds.

"Lead us from the unreal to real, from darkness to light, and from death to immortality. May we be protected together. May we be nourished together. May we work together with great vigor. May our study be enlightening."

The sentiments were evidently lost on the fundamentalists.

The organization Operation Save America later issued a statement confirming that Ante Pavkovic, Kathy Pavkovic, and Kristen Sugar were all arrested in the chambers of the United States Senate "as that chamber was violated by a false Hindu god."

"The Senate was opened with a Hindu prayer placing the false god of Hinduism on a level playing field with the One True God, Jesus Christ," the statement said, adding, "This would never have been allowed by our Founding Fathers."

The Hindu prayer was also questioned by a Christian historian who maintained that since Hindus worship multiple gods, the prayer will be completely outside the American paradigm, flying in the face of the American motto "One Nation Under God."

According to a Senate Chaplain Office communiqué, the purpose of the opening prayer is to seek God on behalf of, and for the Senators and the prayer should affirm our rich heritage as a Nation "under God."

"In Hindu (sic), you have not one God, but many, many, many, many, many gods," the Christian historian David Barton maintained. "And certainly that was never in the minds of those who did the Constitution, did the Declaration [of Independence] when they talked about Creator -- that's not one that fits here because we don't know which creator we're talking about within the Hindu religion."

But the disruption was deplored by the organization Americans United for Separation of Church and State, which said the incident showed the intolerance of many Religious Right activists.

"They say they want more religion in the public square, but it's clear they mean only their religion." Americans United Executive Director Rev. Barry W. Lynn, said.

"America is a land of extraordinary religious diversity, and the Religious Right just can't seem to accept that fact," Lynn said. "I don't think the Senate should open with prayers, but if it's going to happen, the invocations ought to reflect the diversity of the American people."

According to US Senate website, "...Throughout the years, the United States Senate has honored the historic separation of Church and State, but not the separation of God and State...all sessions of the Senate have been opened with prayer, strongly affirming the Senate’s faith in God as Sovereign Lord of our Nation..."

Typically, the Senate Chaplain delivers the opening invocation, but sometimes guest chaplains are invited from all over the country to read the prayer.

Although priests from other faiths such as Islam and Judaism have delivered prayers in the Congress, this is the first time Hindu invocations were delivered on the Senate floor since its formation in 1789.

Zed said he wanted to recite the mantras in Sanskrit, but the Senate Chaplain’s Office communiqué clearly stated, "It must be given exclusively and entirely in the English language."

Over 100 Foreign Missionaries Expelled by Chinese Government Secret Campaign

Bob Fu, China Aid Association, Inc., 267-205-5210, info@ChinaAid.org; www.chinaaid.org, www.monitorchina.org

MIDLAND, Texas, July 10 /Standard Newswire/ -- China Aid Association confirms that a central government-directed campaign to expel suspected foreign missionaries has been ongoing since February 2007.

Typhoon No. 5 Campaign

According to reliable China Aid sources and collaborated reports by at least five different mission agencies, over 100 foreigners accused of being involved in illegal religious activities in China have been expelled or deported this year between April and June. Sources inside the Chinese government informed CAA that the Chinese government launched a massive expulsion campaign of foreign Christians, encoded Typhoon No. 5, in February 2007. This campaign is believed to be part of the "anti-infiltration" efforts to prevent foreign Christians from engaging in mission activities before the Beijing Olympics next year.

Citizens from six countries working in Xinjiang, Beijing and Tibet targeted

Most of those expelled are citizens from the United States, South Korea, Singapore, Canada, Australia, and Israel. They were expelled when they were either working or visiting in Xinjiang, Beijing, Tibet, or Shandong.

According to an American who had been working in Xinjiang for 10 years and wants to remain anonymous because of the sensitivity of the topic, over 60 foreign religious workers were expelled from Xinjiang alone. Some of the workers had been serving the local people for 15-18 years before they were asked to leave in the past few months. At least 15 Christian couples from the United States and other countries were expelled from Beijing in the month of May. Two American English teachers sent by the English Language Institute/China (ELIC) were expelled from Tibet. ELIC (www.elic.org), a California based Christian organization, is the largest English teacher-sending organization to China and has trained thousands of Chinese college and high school students since the 1990s.

On May 31, 2007, one Israeli Jewish Christian and an American were arrested and expelled from Linyi City, Shandong province when they worshiped together with 70 House Church leaders. Only July 1, three American Christians from Indiana were detained in Beijing and then forced to leave China after their US passports were taken away for 3 to 5 days by Chinese security agents.

Consulate Protection Rights Violated

According to CAA's private interviews with some of the expelled Americans, the Chinese PSB confiscated their passports for 2-7 days and treated them professionally while they were interrogated. They were not allowed to have access to US Embassy in Beijing, a direct violation of US-China consulate protection agreements. Some will not be allowed to return to China for 5 years.

This is the largest expulsion of foreign missionaries since 1954 when the Chinese Communist government expelled all foreign religious workers after taking power in 1949. The Chinese government refuses to recognize foreign missionary status in China so many missionaries choose to work in the education or business sectors as ways to stay in China.

"Given the significant contribution to the Chinese people made by those expelled foreigners, this campaign is certainly misguided and counter-productive," said Bob Fu, President of CAA. "We call upon the Chinese government to correct this wrong by allowing these selfless good-hearted people of faith back into China."

Issued by CAA on July 10, 2007.

Book calls for 'religious disarmament' on conversions

New Delhi, June 18 : Religious conversion is a complex and emotionally charged issue but fundamentalists of all hues exploit it, liberals confuse it and many do not comprehend what the fuss is about, says a new book.

Written by an unlikely author, the Catholic Jesuit priest-sociologist Rudolf C. Heredia, "Changing Gods: Rethinking Conversion in India" highlights how mass conversions have alienated people from their past traditions and "lived beliefs".

Heredia is editor of the journal "Social Action" at the Indian Social Institute in New Delhi and has long worked with marginalised communities.

Heredia told IANS: "I am reluctant to sum up three years' work in a sound bite. Perhaps the original title I had chosen 'religious disarmament' says more than just the two words."

This book challenges the "traditional orthodoxies" which promote or oppose religious conversions. Heredia argues that there is "no religious merit in political posturing or conversion for socio-economic gain".

His book portrays how forced conversions have weakened Indian society by dissociating people from their traditions and beliefs. Heredia traces the history of conversion in India and the changes that it wrought in the lives of people, especially tribals and Dalits.

In most cases, he says, conversions fail to alter people's devotion to so-called pagan gods and goddesses but involves them instead in the "politics of hate".

"While religious commitment is essentially a matter of personal conscience and choice, it inevitably impacts other levels of individual and social life," argues the 400-page book. Published by Penguin India, the 400-page paperback book is priced at Rs.350.

To defuse tensions over an issue that has raked up a lot of passion in contemporary India, the author advocates rethinking religious conversions in India with "determined religious disarmament and discarding aggression".

In today's multi-religious society, change of faith can precipitate religious antagonism, or it can facilitate social diversity and tolerance, Heredia argues.

He says that while he remains anchored firmly to his Catholic faith, he is seeking common ground for tolerance and dialogue, premised on a "constructive interaction with other faith traditions."

--- IANS

Kundapur: 'Conversion is Threat to the Country' - Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat

by Vinay Pais - Daijiworld News Network Kundapur

Kundapur, Jul 2: There is a great threat to the country owing to conversion initiated by Christians in the name of social service, said RSS leader Kalladka Prabhakar Bhat.

He was speaking at the anti-conversion awareness meet organized by Hindu Janajagruti Vedike and Bajaranga Dal at Shastri circle here on Monday July 2.


In the last 250 years, Christian missionaries have been indulged in conversion through schools, orphanages, hospital etc. Hence, there is a great threat to Indian culture, thoughts etc, he opined.

A journalist of Kundapur has sent baised reports to a newspaper about the attack on priest. To create awareness about this false report, the meet has been organized, he added. At the same time, he defended the act of Ramanna Shetty who assaulted the Carmelite priest Fr Sylvester Pereira on June 25.

Krishnaprasad Adyantaya, managing trustee of Kollur temple said that, the act of Bajarangadal leaders is appreciable as they foiled the anti-Hindu acts of Christians, he said.

"Dhara Singh, who burnt Christian missionary Stains at Orissa few years ago, is a role model to us. There are many Dara Singhs in Kundapur who can foil the attempt to convert," he opined.

Sangh Parivar leaders Navinchandra, Madhukar Mudrady, Vasant Shetty Belve and Shridhar M were present on the dais.

A call was given by the Sangh Parivar leaders to observe Bundh in Kundapur town afternoon. But there was very poor response to the bundh call as most of the business concerns, shops were open as usual.

Venomous Distortions of The Catholic Church To Insult Buddhist Monks

"All In The Name of Inter-Religious Amity"
Venomous Distortions of The Catholic Church To Insult Buddhist Monks-2

By The Centre for Buddhist Action

Asian Human Rights Commission-Urgent Appeals Program had circulated an email worldwide calling readers "to send a letter to the local authorities to suspend Ven.Harankahawe Chandrawimala's service at school and to conduct impartial inquiries into this matter." It is a shame that a reputed organization such as Asian Human Rights Commission would circulate such an appeal without first checking the accuracy of the allegations leveled against the Ven. Monk unless ofcourse, the AHRC is also one of those organization promoting Christianity and antagonistic towards other religions especially Buddhists and the Buddhist Monks which are hell bent on venomously attacking and insulting the Buddhist Clergy in Sri Lanka. Whatever the case may be, the motive of the distortion is quite clear when reading through the allegations and comparing it with what the Venerable Monk himself has to say of the story speculated worldwide.

Distortion no. 1 is that Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero never ever worked in Moneragala Vidyalaya as stated in the article below as "Monerangala Vidyalaya" and therefore, he was never transferred out of that school due to allegations of misconduct!

The contents of entire letter relating to incidents at Ampitiya Berawattes College circulated by "Asian Human Rights Watch Urgent Appeals Programme" is a series of false allegations purely because the Ven. Monk stood his grounds and did not permit the Catholic Church to have their own way in interfering in the school which incidentally had approx.1500 students of whom the majority were Buddhist with only 40-50 approx. Catholic students! Of the teaching staff 80% are Buddhists while only 20% are Catholics.

Ven.Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero was on the staff of Ampitiya Berawattes College from 2001-2005 and from then on he has been teaching at D.S.Senanayake Vidyalaya to date.

Ampitiya Berawattes College was founded by Reverend Father Berawattes(Catholic Priest) and was the original Ampitiya Seminary under which the school was managed, but during the schools take-over in the early 1960s, the government took over the management of the school as the number of Catholic students attending was insufficient (Buddhist students were in the majority even then) for it to continue as a Catholic School managed by the Church. The Ampitiya Catholic Seminary continued to be within the land premises of Berawattes College. Originally the extent of land which belonged to Berawattes College was 19 ½ Acres but the Catholic Seminary has been encroaching and building Churches inside the premises thereby reducing the extent of land left for the school presently being only 5 Acres! After the schools take over in the 1960s the school was named Ampitiya Maha Vidyalaya. The Junior School was named as Dharmapala Junior School.

14 years ago, the Catholic Church began to interfere in the activities of Ampitiya Maha Vidyalaya and with the manipulations and connivance of the regional educational authorities and the Principal of the school at the time, it was named "Berawattes College" and a statue of Father Berawattes holding a Bible was erected in the school premises. The Dharmapala Junior School has been taken as part of the main school and is part of Berawattes College. With this, the Catholic Church began to organize the Christianization of the entire school activities in a school which had a majority Buddhist student and staff population. The building that was allocated to be the school library was converted into an area where prayer sessions and Christianity classes were conducted and Buddhist children were also being forced into studying Christianity with a view of converting them. It was during this period that even the School Song was changed to include the name of Berawattes College instead of continuing with the old Maha Vidyalaya School Song!

The Rest Room set aside for Buddhist Monks (there were 2) Ven. Mungwatte Dhammananda Thero and Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero was closed down on the pretext that it was to be made into a museum room to exhibit the history of the school and the two Bhikkus were shut out from using it thereafter and had no Rest Room. The church influenced Ven.Mungwatte Dhammananda Thero to the extent that he eventually disrobed and became a Catholic and he was used against Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero.

The Teacher's Quarters when it fell vacant when the teacher occupying it went on transfer was taken over by The Seminary through a Parliamentary Gazette Notification on the grounds that there was no necessity for such quarters during the period approx.2002(later)-2004. At the time Catholic politicians like Dr.Jayalath Jayawardane began to write to the school suggesting that the Teacher's Quarters be handed over to the Carmelite Sisters/Convent. During this time, Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero was vehemently opposed to this move since he felt that the Teacher's Quarters must continue to be used for that purpose. He went to Courts and managed to get a Court Approval to give the use of the Staff Quarters to another teacher of the school and his family instead of being handed over to the Carmelite Convent.

Subsequent to obtaining the Court Order to give back the use of Staff Quarters to the teachers, Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero who saw through the Catholic agenda, organized to erect a Buddha Statue with a glass enclosure and work on the "Budhu Medura" was completed within the school premises so that the Buddhist children could offer flowers and conduct Buddhist observances instead of having to follow Christianity and be converted into Christianity. It was through this period, that the Catholic Church commenced their aggressive harassment campaign against the Venerable Monk because the Monk blocked the agenda of the Church within the school premises! A Catholic Nun on the staff, objected to children plucking flowers in the mornings to offer at The Budhu Medura and this angered the Monk who went and questioned as to who stopped children from offering flowers? The said Nun subsequently had instructed some other students to uproot all the flower plants and throw them into the rubbish heap! When the Monk got to know this incident, he had scolded the Catholic Nun as to why she should be so wicked as to get the plants uprooted ( this probably is what the Asian Human Rights Watch claims to be "mental and physical harassment of teachers"!) On another occasion, another Catholic teacher by the name of Shyamalie Bandara had used very abusive language and insulted the Monk to which the Monk had told the School Principal that he demanded an apology from the said teacher, failing which he would go on a hunger strike until the said teacher was reprimanded (this again is used in a distorted version by Asian Human Rights Watch). Subsequently, as there was no way out the teacher had made a very unwilling apology to the Ven. Monk. Another Catholic teacher by the name of Sachini Surasena was also involved in using Buddhist children(on the sly) to teach them Christian hymns, Scripture and training them for Nativity Plays without permission from the Monk who was their Buddhism teacher.When the Monk heard of this practice, he had actually pulled up the Buddhist children because their parents would eventually find fault with the Monk for not checking their children's activities.

When the Church pressures could not deter Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero's activities to safeguard the Buddhist children and their activities in the school, the Church paid Rs.40,000/= to another teacher who appeared to be a Buddhist, to make a complaint at the Police Station against the monk on allegations of sexual misconduct against a student but on examination the OIC found that the charges were unfounded and the matter was dropped. This same teacher had on one occasion invited the Monk to Dane subsequent to which on a later date had brought a plate of boiled Jak fruit and offered it to the Monk as a special offer of Dane. A few days after consuming this boiled Jak, Ven. Chandrawimala Thero had fallen seriously ill with a urine infection which developed into a serious kidney complication. The Medical Officer who attended to Ven. Chandrawimala Thero had diagnosed his condition as food poisoning after conducting various tests. The kidney condition worsened to the extent that the Monk had to travel to India and get a kidney transplant operation done! Now it would be obvious to the readers as to who harassed whom? After he became sick, it was the Venerable Monk who feared for his life at the hands of the Catholic Church and its well known conspiracies!

The allegations stated in the Asian Human Rights Watch "Denial of the children's freedom of religion and degrading treatment" in which they state 2 incidents of Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero having instructed Catholic children to draw a Cross and Bible on the sand/ floor and walk over them and then to insult them by criticizing them- are total fabrications which the Venerable Monk had never done! At the beginning of letter circulated by Asian Human Rights Watch-Urgent Appeals Programme where it is stated in the 2nd paragraph (quote): "More seriously, it is alleged that Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala assaulted two his fellow teachers physically and mentally several times. One of the two teachers made a complaint to the police station but there has been no serious action taken by the police yet. Even though parents of the children have made several written and oral complaints to the principal, nothing happened to correct this matter. Now the children's parents fear that their children would soon become victims of rape or torture if this matter is not settled immediately" (end quote) is a total fabrication and a method of trying to instill a fear psychosis in the minds of the readers. Are we to believe that, had the Monk truly acted in the manner he is being accused of, that disciplinary or legal action would not have been taken against him? His crime, was that he stood for what was ethical in terms of safeguarding the interests of the Buddhist teachers and students of Berawattes College.

The aggressive character assassination campaign carried out against Ven. Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero is because the said Monk made every effort to stop the Catholic Church from interfering in the internal administration of Berawattes College and efforts to convert Buddhist children unethically-a ploy not new to the Catholic Church as we have seen in the recent past when they attack Buddhist Monks and Temples.

The duplicity of The Catholic Church is visible in every action of theirs and the efforts they make "religious amity by establishing "inter-religious committees" and "inter-racial committees" is merely to hoodwink the public and demean the Buddhists of this country-nothing else. Religious amity has always been shown by Buddhists until Christian groups began to undermine the status of Buddhism in this country and conduct unethical conversions!

Presently Ven.Harankahawe Chandrawimala Thero is not even employed at Berawattes College and it a question as to why this kind of message is being circulated by AHRC now in 2007 if there was any validity to the story given below?


The message circulated worldwide as it appeared: (Quote)
URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION URGENT ACTION

ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM

Dear friends,

The Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has received information that a primary school teacher Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala (Buddhist monk) has allegedly harassed children physically and mentally including in sexual ways, and consistently denied their religious freedom for last two years.

According to our source who followed up the case, child abuse by Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala is explained in 20 odd ways. Also, it is reported that he had been transferred from the previous school in Monarangala Vidiyalaya for charges on child abuse. More seriously, it is alleged that Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala assaulted the two his fellow teachers physically and mentally several times. One of the two teachers made a complaint to the police station but there has been no serious action taken by the police yet. Even though parents of the children have made several written and oral complaints to the principal, nothing happened to correct this matter. Now the children's parents fear that their children would soon become victims of rape or torture if this matter is not settled immediately.

Please send a letter to the local authorities to suspend Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala's service at school and to conduct impartial inquiries into this matter.

Urgent Appeals Desk
Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)
-----------------------------------------------------

DETAILED INFORMATION:

Name of victims: 1. Students of age 06 to 13 (year 01-08) at the primary school attached to the Ampitiya Berawattes College, 2. Ms. X, 24, a fellow teacher, 3, Ms. Y, A catholic nun and volunteer teacher of the school (Names were withheld for victims' security)
Alleged perpetrator: Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala, 45, a Buddhist monk and teacher of the primary school attached to the Ampitiya Berawattes College
Place of abuse: the primary school attached to the Ampitiya Berawattes College
Period of abuse: Since in the end of 2002 until now


Case details:

Primary school teacher Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala has allegedly been accused of harassing children and denying their religious freedom at the primary school attached to the Ampitiya Berawattes College since the end of 2002. Moreover, there is allegation that he has sexually harassed the students continuously. Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala has a history of child abuse. (He was transferred from the previous school in Monarangala Vidiyalaya for charges of child abuse.)

The school was by founded by Fr Berawattes but the school administration was taken over by the Sri Lankan government when the catholic students became a minority in the school in 1962. 70 catholic students are currently studying in the school. In 2001, Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala (a Buddhist monk) was transferred to the school. According to the testimony of the students, his harassment of the children started in the end of 2002.

Denial of the children's freedom of religion and degrading treatment

Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala has harassed the catholic children in all forms. Below are just a few examples of them.

1. On 8 February 2004, Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala ordered the catholic students of year 06 to go out of classroom and draw a cross in the sand. He then made all the children jump across it and remarked that the catholic children paid no respect to the cross.

2. On 11 February 2004, Ven Harankahawe Chandrawimala ordered some catholic children to draw a bible on the floor. Then, he ordered the catholic students of year 07 to walk on the bible while degradingly making a mockery out of it.

It is reported that he has told to the children that Christ is a terrorist, murderer and womaniser. (end quote)

The role of the Catholic Church in Yugoslavia's holocaust

The role of the Catholic Church in Yugoslavia's holocaust - Seán Mac Mathúna, 1941-1945

July 3rd, 2007 by daniel

Historical information about Catholic priests and Muslim clerics being willing accomplices in the genocide of the Yugoslavia's Serbian, Jewish and Roma population during the Second World War.

During the Second World War in Yugoslavia, Catholic priests and Muslim clerics were willing accomplices in the genocide of the nations Serbian, Jewish and Roma population. From 1941 until 1945, the Nazi-installed regime of Ante Pavelic in Croatia carried out some of the most horrific crimes of the Holocaust (known as the Porajmos by the Roma), killing over 800,000 Yugoslav citizens - 750,000 Serbs, 60,000 Jews and 26,000 Roma. In these crimes, the Croatian Ustasha and Muslim fundamentalists were openly supported by the Vatican, the Archbishop of Zagreb Cardinal Alojzije Stepinac (1898-1960), and the Palestinian Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini. Many of the victims of the Pavelic regime in Croatia were killed in the war's third largest death camp - Jasenovac, where over 200,000 people - mainly Orthodox Serbs met their deaths. Some 240,000 were "rebaptized" into the Catholic faith by fundamentalist Clerics in "the Catholic Kingdom of Croatia" as part of the policy to "kill a third, deport a third, convert a third" of Yugoslavia's Serbs, Jews and Roma in wartime Bosnia and Croatia (The Yugoslav Auschwitz and the Vatican, Vladimar Dedijer, Anriman-Verlag, Freiburg, Germany, 1988).

On April 6th 1941, Nazi Germany invaded Yugoslavia. By April 10th, Croatian fascists led by Ante Pavelic were allowed by Hitler and his ally Mussolini to set up a "independent" puppet state of Croatia. Hitler granted "Aryan" status to Croatia as his fascist allies carved up Yugoslavia. Pavelic had been awaiting these developments whilst under the auspices of Mussolini in Italy who had granted them the use of remote training camps on a Aeolian island and access to a propaganda station Radio Bari for broadcasts across the Adriatic. As soon as the new fascist state of Croatia was born, and campaign of cold-blooded terror began, as noted by John Cornwell in his book Hitler's Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII (Viking, London, UK, 1999):

"(It was) an act of 'ethnic cleansing' before that hideous term came into vogue, it was an attempt to create a 'pure' Catholic Croatia by enforced conversions, deportations, and mass exterminations. So dreadful were the acts of torture and murder that even hardened German troops registered their horror. Even by comparison with the recent bloodshed in Yugoslavia at the time of writing, Pavelic's onslaught against the Orthodox Serbs remains one of the most appalling civilian massacres known to history" (p 249)

Furthermore, as Cornwell notes, Pius XII had not only "warmly endorsed" Croat nationalism, he had, before the war in November 1939, described the Croats in a speech as an "the outpost of Christianity" of whom "the hope of a better future seems to be smiling on you". Pavelic and Pope Puis XII "frequently exchanged cordial telegrams" according to Dedijer, one on New Year's Day 1943, saw the Pope give his blessing to Pavelic:

Everything that you have expressed so warmly in your name and in the name of the Croatian Catholics we return gracefully and give you and the whole Croatian people our apostolic blessing (Dedijer, p 115).

On April 25th 1941, following his seizure of power, Pavelic decreed that all publications, private and public, of the Cyrillic script was banned. In May 1941, anti-Semitic legislation was passed, defining Jews in racist terms, preventing them from marrying "Aryans". One month later all Serb Orthodox primary and preschools were closed. As soon as Pavelic had taken power, the Catholic Church in Croatia began compelling Orthodox Serbs to convert to the Catholic religion. But this was, as pointed out by Cornwell, a highly-selective policy: the fascists had no intention of allowing Orthodox priests or members of the Serb intelligentsia into the religion - they were to be exterminated along with their families. However, for those Serbs who were forced to convert, there was no immunity or protection from the Catholic church when the "crazed bloodletting" of the Ustashe began, as indicated by the speech made by the Croatian Nazi Mile Budak, who was a Minister in the Ustasha regime in Gospic, Bosnia during July 1941:

We will kill one part of the Serbs, the other part we will resettle, and the remaining ones we will convert to the Catholic faith, and thus make Croats of them (Dedijer, p 130).

Budak was talking about something that had already started: In an example of savage butchery carried out in the village of Glina on May 14th 1941, hundreds of Serbs were brought to a church to attend an obligatory service of thanksgiving for the fascist state of Croatia. Once the Serbs were inside, the Ustashe entered the Church armed only with axes and knives. They asked all present to produce their certificates of conversion to Catholicism - but only two had the required documents, and they were released. The doors of the church were locked and the rest slaughtered.

Like with the Jews, who had to wear the Star of David in public, the Serbs were forced to wear a blue band with the letter "P" (i.e., Orthodox) on their sleeve. The Nazi regime decreed that the Roma were to be "treated as Jews" and they were forced to wear yellow armbands. (A History of the Gypsies of Eastern Europe and Russia, David M. Crowe, St. Martin's Griffin, New York, USA, 1994).
Stepinac blesses the puppet Nazi regime in Croatia

When the Nazi's installed the puppet Ustashi regime in May 1941, Stepinac immediately offered his congratulations to Pavelic, and held a banquet to celebrate the founding of the new nation. After the opening of the Ustasha Parliament, Pavelic attended Zagreb cathedral, where Stepinac offered special prayers for Pavelic and ordered a solemn "Te Deum" to be sung in thanks to God for the establishment of the new regime. In May 1941, Stepinac also arranged to have Pavelic received personally by Pope Pius XII in Rome in the Vatican, where on the same occasion, he signed a treaty with Mussolini. Once Pavelic was in power, Stepinac issued a Pastoral Letter ordering the Croatian clergy to support the new Ustasha State. Stepinac alter recorded in his diary on 3rd August 1941 that "the Holy See (the Vatican) recognized de facto the independent State of Croatia". In the same year, Stepinac himself declared:

"God, who directs the destiny of nations and controls the hearts of Kings, has given us Ante Pavelic and moved the leader of a friendly and allied people, Adolf Hitler, to use his victorious troops to disperse our oppressors... Glory be to God, our gratitude to Adolf Hitler and loyalty to our Poglavnik, Ante Pavelic."

The involvement of Catholic clergy either in active participation or in blessing the Ustashi involvement in the Holocaust is well-documented. Stepinac himself headed the committee which was responsible for forcible "conversions" to Roman Catholicism under threat of death, and was also the Supreme Military Apostolic Vicar of the Ustashi Army, which effected the slaughter of those who failed to convert. Stepinac was known as the 'Father Confessor' to the Ustashi and continually bestowed the blessing of Catholic Church upon its members and actions.

Right from the very beginning, the Vatican knew what was happening in Croatia, and certainly known to Pius XII when he greeted Pavelic in Vatican - jus four days after the massacre at Glina. On this visit, Pavelic had a "devotional" audience with Pius XII, and the Vatican granted de-facto recognition of fascist Croatia as a "bastion against communism" - despite the fact that the Vatican still had diplomatic ties with Yugoslavia. Cornwell observes that right from the start it was known that Pavelic was a "totalitarian dictator", a "puppet of Hitler and Mussolini", that he had passed racist and anti-Semitic laws, and that he was "bent on enforced conversions from Orthodox to Catholic Christianity". Effectively, on behalf of Hitler and Mussolini, the Pope was "holding Pavelic's hand and bestowing his papal blessing" to the new puppet state of Croatia. Thus, it can argued, that the Catholic Cardinals in the Vatican were accomplices of the Holocaust in Yugoslavia and the extermination of the countries Jews, Serbs and Roma citizens. Indeed, many of members of Croatian Catholic clergy took a "leading part" in the Holocaust.

One leading member of the Catholic church in Croatia was the Nazi collaborator Archbishop Alojzije Stepinac. When he met Pavelic on April 16th 1941, he later noted that he had promised that he would "not show tolerance" to the Orthodox Serbian church - which gave Stepinac the impression that Pavelic "was a sincere Catholic". By June 1941, when German army units were reporting that the "Ustashe have gone raging mad" killing Serbs, Jews and Roma, Catholic priests, notably Franciscans took a leading part in the massacres, as pointed out by Cornwell:

"Priests, invariably Franciscans, took a leading part in the massacres. Many, went around routinely armed and performed their murderous acts with zeal. A Father Bozidar Bralow, known for the machine gun that was his constant companion, was accused of performing a dance around the bodies of 180 massacred Serbs at Alipasin-Most. Individual Franciscans killed, set fire to homes, sacked villages, and laid waste the Bosnian countryside at the head of Ustashe bands. In September of 1941, an Italian reporter wrote of a Franciscan he had witnessed south of Banja Luka urging on a band of Ustashe with his crucifix." (p 254).

It is clear now, that other members of the Catholic Cardinals in Europe also knew about the massacres. On March 6th 1942, a French Cardinal Eugène Tisserant, a close confident of the Pope to the Croatian representative to the Vatican:

"I know for a fact, that it is the Franciscans themselves, as for example Father Simic of Knin, who have taken part in attacks against the Orthodox populations so as to destroy, the Orthodox Church. In the same way, you destroyed the Orthodox Church in Banja Luka. I know for sure that the Franciscans in Bosnia and Herzegovina have acted abominably, and this pains me. Such acts should not be committed by educated, cultured, civilized people, let alone by priests". (p 259)

The Catholic Church took full advantage of Yugoslavia's defeat in 1941 to increase the power and outreach of Catholicism in the Balkans - Stepinac had shown contempt for religious freedom in way that even Cornwell says was "tantamount to complicity with the violence" against Yugoslavia's Jews, Serbs and Roma. For his part, the Pope "was never but benevolent" to the leaders and representatives of fascist Croatia - in July 1941 he greeted a hundred members of the Croatian police force headed by the Zagreb chief of police; in February 1942, he gave gave an audience for Ustashe youth group visiting Rome, and he also greeted another representation of Ustashe youth in December of that year. The Pope showed his true colours when in 1943 he told a Croatian papal representative that he was:

"Disappointed that, in spite of everything, no one wants to acknowledge the one, real and principal enemy of Europe; no true, communal military crusade against Bolshevism has been initiated" (p 260)

Stepinac for one, appears to have been a full supporter of forced conversions - along with many of his bishops, one of whom described the advent of fascist Croatia as "a good occasion for us to help Croatia save the countless souls" - i.e., Yugoslavia's non-Catholic majority. Throughout the war, Croatian bishops not only endorsed forced conversions, they never, at any point, dissociated themselves from Pavelic's regime, let alone denounce it or threaten to excommunicate him or any other senior member of the regime. In fact, before Yugoslavia was invaded, Stepinac had told Regent Prince Paul of Yugoslavia in April 1940:

"The most ideal thing would be for the Serbs to return to the faith of their fathers, that is, to bow the head before Christ's representative (the Pope). Then we could at last breathe in this part of Europe, for Byzantinism has played a frightful role in the history this part of the world" (p 265).

The Pope was better informed of the situation inside Yugoslavia than he was about any other area of Europe. His apostolic delegate, Marcone, was a regular visitor to Croatia, travelling on military planes between Rome and Zagreb. Cornwell describes Marcone - who was the Popes personal representative in Croatia - as "an amateur who appeared to sleepwalk through the entire bloodthirsty era" (p 257).

The Vatican would also have been aware of frequent BBC broadcasts on Croatia, of which the following (which were monitored by the Vatican State), on February 16th 1942, was typical:

"The worst atrocities are being committed in the environs of the archbishop of Zagreb [Stepinac]. The blood of brothers is flowing in (the) streams. The Orthodox are being forcibly converted to Catholicism and we do not hear the archbishop's voice preaching revolt. Instead it is reported that he is taking part in Nazi and Fascist parades" (p 256).

And, according to to Dedijer:

Throughout the whole war in more than 150 newspapers and magazines, the church justified the fascist state under Pavelic as the work of God.

Many Roman Catholic priests served the Ustasha state in high positions. The pope appointed the highest military vicar for Croatia. The latter had a field chaplain in every unit of the Ustasha army. The task of this field chaplain consisted among other things of repeatedly goading the Ustasha units in their mass murders of the peasant population. High dignitaries of the Roman Catholic Church and of the Ustasha state together organized the mass conversion of the Orthodox Serbian population. Hundreds of Orthodox churches in Serbia were plundered and destroyed; the three highest dignitaries and two hundred clerics were murdered in cold blood; the remainder of the clergy were driven into exile. In the concentration camp of Jasenovac, hundreds of thousands of Serbs were murdered under the command of Roman Catholic priests.

The papal emissary Marcone was in Croatia during this entire time. He sanctioned silently all the gory deeds and permitted pictures of himself with Pavelic and the German commanders to be published in the newspapers. After the visit to Pope Pius XII, Ante Pavelic exchanged Christmas and New Year's greetings with him that were published in the Ustasha press.

Pavelic escapes to Argentina disguised as a Catholic priest

The Catholic Church was not only closely involved with the Ustasha movement in wartime Croatia, it helped many Nazi war criminals escape at the end of the war, including Ante Pavelic, who fled to Argentina via the Vatican and the "ratlines" of the Vatican. In mid-year 1986 the U.S. government released documents of their counter-espionage agency, the OSS. These reveal that the Vatican had organized a safe-flight route from Europe to Argentina for Pavelic and two hundred of his advisors known by name. The fascists hid frequently during their flight in cloisters and in many instances disguised themselves as Franciscan monks (Pavelic himself escaped disguised as a Catholic priest).

Also, at the end of the war, the Ustashe looted some $80 million from Yugoslavia, much of which was composed of gold coins. Here again, they had the total collaboration of Vatican, which according to Cornwell included not only hospitality of a pontifical Croatian religious institution (the College of San Girolamo degli Illirici in Rome), but also provision of storage facilities and safe-deposit services for the Ustashe treasury. During the war, the College of San Girolamo became a home for Croatian priests receiving Vatican-sponsored theological education - after the war, it became the headquarters for the postwar Ustashe underground, providing Croatian war criminals with escape routes to Latin America.

A leading figure at the College of San Girolamo was the Croatian priest and Nazi war criminal Father Krunoslav Draganavic - described once by U.S. intelligence officials as Pavelic's "alter ego". His arrival in Rome in 1943 was to coordinate Italian-Ustashe activities, and after the war, he was a central figure in the organising escape routes for Nazi's to Argentina. It was later claimed that members of the CIA had said that he had been allowed to store the archives of the Croatian legation inside the Vatican, as well as valuables brought out of Yugoslavia by fleeing Ustashe in 1945.

The most famous Nazi mass-murderer who passed through the College of San Girolamo was Klaus Barbie, known as the Butcher of Lyons, the Gestapo police chief in that French city between 1942 and 1944, who had tortured and murdered Jews and members of the French resistance. Barbie lived under Draganavic's protection at San Girolamo from early 1946 until late 1947, when the US Counter Intelligence Corp helped him escape to Latin America. Another Nazi war criminal, Franz Stangl, the commandant of the Treblinka death camp was assisted with false papers and hiding places in Rome by the Nazi sympathizer Bishop Alois Hudal. Draganavic was expelled from San Girolamo a few days after Pope Pius XII death in October 1958.

While it may be true that individual Catholics risked their lives to save the Jews, Roma and Serbs from the Holocaust, the Catholic Church, as an entity, did not. The Vatican also assisted thousands of Nazi war criminals such as Adolph Eichmann, Franz Stangl (the commandant of Treblinka), Walter Rauf (the inventor of the "mobile" gas chamber), and Klaus Barbie (the "Butcher of Lyons"). Pope Pius XII personally authorized the smuggling of Nazi war criminals, which was directed by his political advisor Giovanni Montini (who later became Pope Paul VI). Shortly before his death in Madrid in 1959, Pope John XXIII granted Pavelic his special blessing. On his death bed, Pavelic held a wreath that was a personal gift from Pope Pius XII from the year 1941.
Stepinac found guilty of collaboration

After the war Stepinac was arrested by the Yugoslav government and sentenced to 17 years in prison for war crimes. A parade of prosecution witnesses at his trial in Zagreb testified on October 5, 1946, that Catholic priests armed with pistols went out to convert Orthodox Serbs and massacred them. In one instance, one witness said 650 Serbs were taken into a church under false pretenses, and then were stabbed and beaten to death by Ustashi members after the doors were locked. Stepinac was convicted on all principal counts of aiding the Axis, the Nazi puppet of Ante Pavelic, and of glorifying the Ustashi in the Catholic press, pastoral letters, and speeches. He eventually died under house arrest in 1960 after being sentenced to life imprisonment for collaboration by the postwar communist government in Yugoslavia.

The Investigation by the Yugoslav War Crimes Commission established that Stepinac had played a leading part in the conspiracy that led to the conquest and breakdown of the Kingdom of Yugoslavia in 1941. It was furthermore established that he had played a role in governing the Nazi puppet state of Croatia, that many members of his clergy participated actively in atrocities and mass murders, and, finally, that they collaborated with the enemy down to the last day of the Nazi rule, and continued after the liberation to conspire against the newly created Federal Peoples Republic of Yugoslavia.

Stepinac only served a few years in prison because of the Vatican's anti-Communist propaganda of the "suffering martyr" and their organizing of "Cardinal Stepinac Associations" which lobbied for his release.

Jews and Serbs say that Stepinac was a Nazi collaborator. Catholic supporters claim he initially backed the regime, but later withdrew his support because of the mass executions and forced conversions of Orthodox Christians to Catholicism - although little credible evidence is presented of this.

Archbishop Stepinac was beatified by Pope John Paul II in Croatia on October 1998. Following the countries succession from Yugoslavia in 1991, the ultra-Nationlist Tudjman regime in Croatia renamed a village in Krajina after him. The late President Tudjman himself is on record as having said that he is "proud that his wife has no Jewish or Serbian blood in her". Ironically, unlike Pavelic himself, whose wife seems to have been Jewish (Pavelic's mother-in law, Ivana Herzfeld was said to be was Jewish)

Like the French Nazi Jean-Marie Le Pen (who described the Holocaust as a "mere detail of history"), Tudjman also become a Holocaust revisionist. In his book Wastelands of History, he questioned the truth behind the Holocaust and moved to cover up the role of Ustashe regime in the darkest period of Croatia's history. Worse, Tudjman rehabilitated fascist war criminals and gave them medals, and, as in the case of Stepinac, had streets named after them.

On two occasions in 1970 and 1994, attempts were made to the Yad Vashem Holocaust to get Stepinac added to the "List of the Righteous" - which includes people like Oskar Schindler, but this was turned down. Interestingly, the request was sent by private Jewish citizens from Croatia and not the official Jewish organization in Croatia, which has never sent such a request Explaining the refusal, an official of the Yad Vashem explained that:

"Persons who assisted Jews but simultaneously collaborated or were linked with a Fascist regime which took part in the Nazi orchestrated persecution of Jews, may be disqualified for the Righteous title".

Nazi connection to Franciscan Order uncovered near Medjugorje, Bosnia

The Franciscan order has always denied the evidence of its wartime ties to the Ustasha regime in Croatia. They acted as facilitators and middlemen in moving the contents of the Ustasha Treasury from Croatia to Austria, Italy and finally South America after the war. During the Nazi occupation of Bosnia, the Franciscans were closely involved with the Ustashe regime. Not far from Medjugorje in Bosnia (where the Virgin Mary is said to put in nightly appearances for the tens of thousands of Roman Catholic pilgrims), is the Franciscan monastery at Sirkoi Brijeg which has become the centre of allegations linking it to disappearance of the Ustashe treasury after the war.

In San Francisco Federal Court in November 1999, in what was described as "tangible proof" of the Nazi Franciscan connection, was obtained when cameramen working for Phillip Kronzer (who has helped expose the Medjugorje myth) obtained entry to the Monastery and filmed a secret shrine honouring the Ustashe. A plaque dedicated to Franciscan monks who were Ustasha members was filmed along with a massive shrine lining the walls complete with photographs of Ustasha soldiers some in Nazi uniforms. The admonition, "Recognize us, We are yours" can clearly be seen in the video footage. On a later visit to the monastery the shrine had been dismantled but the videotape preserved the evidence and has now been made available by the Kronzer Foundation.
Cold War Era Files May Hold the Key to Holocaust Lawsuit

A Freedom of Information Act lawsuit was filed in August 2000 in San Francisco, USA by California attorneys Jonathan Levy and Tom Easton against the U.S. Army and the CIA. Easton and Levy are also pursuing a Holocaust era lawsuit against the Vatican Bank and Franciscan Order regarding the disappearance of the World War II Nazi Croatian treasury including gold, silver, and jewels plundered from concentration camp victims in Croatia and Bosnia, mainly Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies.

The lawyers are seeking the release of over 250 documents from the files of Draganavic. He is now regarded as one of the of the principal operators of the so-called Vatican "ratline" that smuggled Nazis and their loot to South America between 1945 and the late 1950's. Beneficiaries of the ratline included Adolf Eichman, Klaus Barbie "the butcher of Lyons" and the notorious Croatian mass murderer Ante Pavelic as well as thousands of lesser known Nazis and collaborators.

While file releases on the ratline date from as early as the 1983 Barbie case, a core of documents remain withheld on grounds of "national security." It is these documents the attorneys want from the Army and CIA. They describe him as a "sinister priest" who is alleged to have worked at various times for the secret services of Croatia, the Vatican, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia as well as British and American intelligence.

The attorneys have suggested that the withheld documents, most well over 40 years old are highly embarrassing to the Americans, the British, and Vatican and hold the key to a multinational money laundering scheme that used Holocaust victim loot to finance covert Cold War era operations against the Soviet Union and its allies.

The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in San Francisco.

By Seán Mac Mathúna

Labels: ,

What is the most dangerous idea in religion today?

July 13, 2007, 2:48PM
Ideology matters
What is the most dangerous idea in religion today?

By JOHN BLAKE
Cox News Service

ATLANTA — Religion is one of the most potent forces in human affairs. It has inspired some of history's most sublime moments, but also some of its most barbaric.

The Inquisition, bombings of abortion clinics, suicide bombings in Iraq — all have their roots in some form of religious ideology.

With that in mind, five leading thinkers from varying faiths were asked the same question: What is the most dangerous idea in religion today? Their comments were edited for brevity and clarity.

Violence in the name of God — Richard Land

"I would agree with Pope John Paul II, who said that there is a sacred sanctuary of the soul for each man and woman. No other human being has the right to coercively interfere with that sacred sanctuary of the soul. The most dangerous idea in religion is the idea that violent, coercive force is permissible in the name of God — any God.

"You see this with radical Islam. Notice that I said radical Islam, not Islam.

"More people will die if this idea spreads. It will help poison the well of debate and discussion about issues that people disagree on. It's corrosive to public discourse to say if you disagree with me, I'm going to kill you. It erodes freedom of speech, assembly and worship."

Richard Land is the president of the Southern Baptist Convention's Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission. He was selected by Time Magazine in 2005 as one of the 25 most influential evangelicals in America.

Follow our rules or else — Wayne Dyer

"Carl Jung (an author and psychiatrist) had a line. The paraphrase is this: The No. 1 problem with organized religion is that the purpose of organized religion is to prevent people from having a direct experience of God. Religion is organized around the principle that religion will provide the direct experience of God for you as long as you become a member, follow our rules and contribute to us financially.

"The most important thing human beings can recognize is that they are already connected to God, and to maintain that connection is not something you can turn over to another person or organization. One of the truths of the physical world is that you must be like what you came from. If you have an apple pie and you ask what the apple pie is like, it's like (the apple) where it came from."

Wayne Dyer is one of the most popular self-help speakers in the nation. He's the best-selling author of 29 books and has been featured frequently on Public Broadcasting Service specials.

My religion is right — Rabbi Harold Kushner

"There's a sense that in order for me to be right, everyone who disagrees with me is wrong. It makes religious interfaith cooperation more difficult. If I believe that, I have to believe that other people's religions are worthless, invalid.

"You have to understand that religion is not about getting information about God. Religion is about community. The primary purpose is not to get us to heaven but to put us in touch with other people. I can have fierce loyalty to my family without denigrating other people's family. I can have fierce loyalty to my own religion without denigrating other people's religion. In the same way, my neighbor can say that my wife is the most wonderful woman in the world. I can take that as a statement of love, not fact."

Rabbi Harold Kushner is one of the most famous Jewish thinkers in the nation. He is best known for his best-selling book, When Bad Things Happen to Good People (Anchor, $21).

Converting others to your religion — Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im

"I wouldn't believe in a religion if I didn't believe it to be better than other religions. The notion of superiority and exclusivity is inherent to religious beliefs. It can be dangerous and not be dangerous.

"The whole idea of missionary work is a very loaded and dangerous idea because it's often presented as simply presenting beliefs for someone to accept or reject. It's always embedded in power. Those who have the ability to proselytize to others are more powerful than others. They have the resources to establish schools, hospitals. Missionary work is not neutral. It is embedded in power. You don't find Muslims coming to proselytize in the U.S. But you find Americans going to all sorts of Muslim countries."

Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im is an internationally recognized scholar of Islam and human rights. He is the Charles Howard Candler Professor of Law at Emory University.

A tribal view of God — Deepak Chopra

"The most dangerous idea is my God is the only true God and my religion is the only true religion. It leads to quarrels, divisiveness, terrorism, prejudice, racism and bloodshed.

"All religious ideas are programmed into our consciousness at a very early age. We hold them to be true. It's very difficult to step out of that condition even in the face of good intellectual reasoning because of emotional bondage to our condition. We bristle with emotions when our beliefs are threatened.

"We are at a very critical stage in our evolution. We're beginning to become aware. We know a lot about nature. We have a pretty good idea about the beginning of the universe. We understand to a great extent the laws of physics, chemistry and biology. And yet for the vast majority of us, though we have cell phones and can make nuclear bombs, our psychological and spiritual evolution is frozen to a level that is very tribal."

Deepak Chopra is chairman and co-founder of the Chopra Center for Wellbeing in Carlsbad, Calif. He is a best-selling author and popular lecturer best known for integrating Western medicine with the natural healing traditions of the East.

Genuine tears in Pak vs hypocritical tears in India

V SUNDARAM

I was highly amused to read a news item in one of the newspapers on 29 May 2007 to the effect that at least three thousand (3000) Christians, Dalits and human rights activists from different parts of the country courted arrest at Jantar Mantar in New Delhi on 28 May 2007 while protesting against the calculated �Silence� of the Government on the alleged rise in Anti-Christian attacks throughout India. At a rally holding aloft their proclamation banner 'Stop Violence on Christians', Christian and Dalit leaders, which included All India Christian Council (AICC!!) President Joseph Dsouza, National Integration Council Member John Dayal, Justice Party President Udit Raj and Mount Carmel School Principal V K Williams, issued a strong warning to the Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh that his silence could lead to killing of innocent people at the hands of communal forces now working themselves out to unseen levels of frenzy in India.

Madhu Chandra, an All India Christian Council (AICC) leader, told the media: �The protest rally was in the wake of attacks on Pastor Walter Masih in Jaipur, Rajasthan on 19 April 2007 and on Christian priests Ramesh Gopargode and Ajit Belavi on 7 May 2007 in Kolhapur, Maharashtra, and a generally high incidence of communal assaults against Christians this year thus far. In 2006, the All India Christian Council (AICC) recorded at least one incident of anti-Christian attack every third day, but this rose to one attack every alternate day during the first four months of this year in 2007�.

Expressing his great disappointment with the Congress party that leads the UPA in New Delhi, John Dayal added that it was no longer only the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) that should be blamed for anti-Christian agenda, but also the Sonia Congress Party. He said: �Look at the Congress-government in Himachal Pradesh, which enacted the anti-conversion law. Christianity in India has been reduced to a 'daylight religion', because the people of the community feel unsafe after sunset�. Perhaps they would feel safer in Multan District in Pakistan, as will be seen from the facts to be narrated below.

The participants in the protest rally were from several states including Delhi, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Punjab, Orissa and Andhra Pradesh and they shouted slogans against the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government, saying, 'UPA government, wake up and stop atrocities on Christians.' Likewise, in the last week of May, Christians in Mumbai also staged a rally at Azad Maidan to show solidarity with the protesters here.

Let us contrast this politically imagined situation of fictionalised atrocities against the Christians in India with what is actually happening in Pakistan today. It has been extensively reported in all forms of media during the last one week that Christian clerics in Multan District in Pakistan are being forced to convert to Islam or face death. Naveed Amer Jeeva, Pastor Joseph Daniel, Dr Elvin and Pastor Mehtab Masih, all front rank leaders of the All Pakistan Minorities Alliance (APMA) stated at a joint news conference on 6 July 2007 in Multan: �As many as 10 Christian Clerics have received threatening letters from unidentified people reading � 'Embrace Islam, Stop Preaching Christianity and quit your faith. Otherwise the count down of your life has begun'�.

Naveed Amer Jeeva of the APMA said: �A state of fear prevails in Shanti Nagar (Multan Town) because District and Provincial Governments have turned a deaf ear to our problems. We are feeling insecure and unsafe today because of these threatening letters from Muslim fanatics. Pastor Mukhtar Barkat had received a similar threatening letter from Muslim fanatics in 2004 and was assassinated on 5 January 2004 in Khurrampura Khanewal. The minorities in general and the Christians in particular are not safe in Pakistan. Recently, Christians in Charsadda also received threatening letters warning them to shut their Churches and convert to Islam... Even a petition has been filed against the appointment of Justice Bhagawan Das as acting Chief Justice of Pakistan on the ground that he is a non-Muslim (a Hindu)�.

When the Reserve Bank of India brought out a two rupee Coin with a Christian Cross inscribed on it, in these columns, I had written an article attacking the Government of India and also the Reserve Bank of India for functioning as informal unpaid agents for the promotion of Christianity in India. Soon the matter was taken up by print media and TV channels and a public debate took place. Later many political leaders and leaders from Hindu organisations condemned Reserve Bank of India. At that time the Reserve Bank of India gave a highly loaded and political clarification in the following words: �The reverse of the coin contains the visuals showing stylized representation of 'Unity in Diversity', a defining characteristic of our country. The symbol shall be seen as four heads sharing a common body. It shall be thought of as people from all parts of the country coming together under one banner and identifying with one nation. The visual code helps the user connect with an individual denomination, which makes the process of identification quicker�.

When the RBI gave the above clarification, Smt. Radha Rajan raised the following pertinent question: �The RBI must also inform us about when and how it was established my mutual consensus or general understanding in the country that the design which I call the CROSS, is according to the RBI, a symbol of unity in diversity. Was Parliament taken into confidence on this issue?... I for one have never seen this symbol anywhere before it appeared on our coins as representing unity in diversity. And one may question further, why four heads? Four heads of what entity?�.

Rev Fr Babu Joseph, spokesperson of the Catholic Bishops' Conference of India (CBCI) thought otherwise: � The whole controversy around the symbol of unity depicted on the reverse side of the two rupee coin as promotion of Christianity in India is nothing short of figment of imagination of certain individuals and groups in India that are obsessed with anti-minorityism. The Reserve Bank of India has made clarification on what the symbol actually meant and the matter should have been considered closed. Instead, these vested groups are trying to whip up uncalled for passion against a symbol which is universally accepted as representative of unity of people, cultures and religions which India truly represents. By raising such frivolous issues through political parties and organizations, we serve no useful purpose except create more social wedge between communities�.

When legitimate issues were raised by responsible journalists and political leaders, the anti-Hindu Christian leaders of the Church in India let loose a barrage of vitriolic abuse against the Hindus and Hindu organisations of India. Some of them like Dr John Dayal spoke about �Hindu political desperados and their hate campaigns and their chilling impact on the Christian masses of India�. Many of them showed great compassion and concern towards the Muslim terrorists of India who had destroyed our temples in Banaras and elsewhere. They said that Hindu attempts to paint a Muslim as a traitor and a murderer will hopefully invite administrative and judicial attention and the punishments that should go with such crimes in a democratic India.

Recently taking note of the communal politics of anti-National minorityism practiced by some of the Christian leaders and Christian organisations in India, the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) gave a detailed memorandum to the President of India, fully documented with facts and figures, inviting his attention to the false propaganda of the 'Goebbels Variety' being carried on by these Christian forces against the peace loving and tolerant Hindus in majority in India. They stated as follows: �For some days now a misinformation campaign is on the go about alleged attacks on Christian missionaries. Unfortunately, some vested interests have been conspiring to haul the names of Hindu organizations into these episodes. Whenever any such incident comes to notice, even earlier than the actuality verified by the process of law comes to the fore, the Christian clergy, clerics, bishops and nuns hit the streets along with hundreds of students studying in missionary schools and make postures calling Hindu organizations names. A section of the media, with an eye on escalating their TRP and enhancing their 'secular image', acts hawk in putting these incidents under the nose of the world. In the process, they not only bring disrepute to the Hindu society that has a glorious tradition of tolerance and respect for all schools of religion, but also immensely damage the image of their own great country in the eyes of the world, and unwittingly allow themselves to be taken for a ride by the anti-India forces�.

Swamy Dayanand Saraswati told me that three leading Rabbis who met him in New Delhi told him that India is the only country in the world where the Jews have never been persecuted at any point of time in the last 2000 years. Our Christian leaders should also take their lessons from them, if not from the fanatic Muslims of Multan District in Pakistan today. In this context, I cannot help quoting the brilliant words of VOLTAIRE (1694-1778):

'Christianity is the most ridiculous, the most absurd and bloody religion that has ever infected the world- - -Where is the prince sufficiently educated to know that for seventeen hundred years the Christian sect has done nothing but harm?' (LETTERS TO FREDRICK THE GREAT, 1767) 'Pagan religion shed very little blood, while ours flooded the earth with it' (PHILOSOPHICAL DICTIONARY- 'RELIGION')

'CHRISTIANITY HAS DELUGED THE EARTH WITH BLOOD FOR THE SAKE OF SOPHISMS' (PHILOSOPHICAL DICTIONARY- 'RELIGION').

Thoughts on Christianity and American Indian Tribal Sovereignty

By Tim Mitchell

“Liberals feel unworthy of their possessions. Conservatives feel they deserve everything they’ve stolen.”-- Mort Sahl
I have come to realize over the years that despite America’s frequent idealization of the individual and individual rights, many movements that support the preservation and advancement of minority rights are often powerless in the face of a hostile or indifferent majority. For as much as Americans idolize and value originality and freedom, our own history of rife with examples of a powerful, uniform majority pushing smaller groups to the bottom of our social hierarchy. Even our Founding Fathers, who wrote that “all men are created equal” in the Constitution, owned slaves and viewed women as second-class citizens. Indeed, for as much as some insist that our personal rights are inherent in the very act of being human, the actual recognition and value of our rights depends all too often upon the support of others--many, many others.

It is in this frame of mind that I approach this article, which I am writing as a response to an editorial that was recently published in the Native American newspaper, Indian Country. The editorial ran on June 21st and it is entitled “Christianity and sovereignty can co-exist”. While I understand that there is a complicated relationship between the American Indian tribes and Christianity, the religion introduced in the Americas by European settlers, I could not help but to wonder what on earth the author of this piece was thinking. I mean, this is CHRISTIANITY we’re talking about, the same religion that instigated or was a willing participant in the Doctrine of Discovery, the Indian Religious Crimes Code, and the Indian Boarding Schools in the U.S. and Canada--all efforts to undermine and ultimately destroy American Indian religion and culture. This is the same religion that accepted money from the federal government to “Christianize” the tribes (the First Amendment be damned), the same religion whose missionaries coined the phrase “kill the Indian, and save the man” and gave slanderous names such as “Devil’s Tower” and “Devil’s Lake” to geographic areas deemed sacred by the “heathen” tribes. During the second Bush Administration, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), which has taken on a sizable influx of conservative Christian employees and cases to defend (among other things) “viewpoint discrimination” against evangelical Christians, filed an anonymous “white paper” in 2006 to block Congressional passage of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act (IHCIA) on the grounds that “direct federal funding for traditional health care practices that have a religious component may raise concerns under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.” Christianity has persistently fought against religious pluralism for the vast majority of its history; why would ANY indigenous group want Christianity involved in its fight for sovereignty? To quote the old adage, with friends like that, who needs enemies?

I come to the subject of American Indian tribal sovereignty from the perspective of an outsider; while my wife is of Cherokee heritage, my ancestors are very European. Nevertheless, I have spent much time in my recent articles discussing the status of American Indian religion in the context of Christian missionary and evangelization efforts across the centuries and I found myself puzzled over this editorial. The editorial does question the collective Christian church’s lack of participation in the American Indians’ movement toward self-determination, yet it still concludes that “tribal sovereignty does not exclude Christian beliefs or members ... Christian belief should not exclude the rights and values of indigenous peoples.” In this article, I will review key points of the editorial in light of my understanding of the Christian church’s seemingly endless campaign to convert others and its particular proselytization efforts aimed towards the indigenous cultures of the American continents. In particular, I feel that instead of asking whether Christianity can exist within an indigenous sovereignty movement, the question that should be asked is whether both indigenous religions--and in turn the tribal cultures that sustain them--can survive within an overwhelmingly Christian world.

A Holy Crusade to Homogenize Humanity

Before I begin to examine the “Christianity and sovereignty can co-exist” editorial in detail, I will first discuss my perspective on the nature of religion and culture. While it could be argued that religion and culture are two separate entities, it has been my experience that the two are deeply intertwined. For example, religion is not just about faith in the divine; like culture, it provides people with a sense of history and identity. For that reason, it does not surprise me that there is no such thing as a “secular” American Indian tribe; each tribe’s identity, its sense of origin and purpose, is deeply connected with its unique spiritual belief system. To put it in another light, you could say that spirituality is like language in that it is an inherently human trait, and that all human beings are capable of it in some capacity. Like language, human history has also shown that spirituality is capable of flourishing both in a wide array of conceptual foundations (polytheistic, monotheistic, pantheistic, etc.) and in a wide variety of cultural structures, from basic hunter-gatherer groups to international post-industrial unions.

Christianity can provide individuals with a sense of identity as other religions can, but there is something historically different about it: from its rise to prominence in ancient Rome, Christianity has been--and continues to be--a religion of empire. Whether it is the religion of choice for each of the colonial empires of Europe or the prominent religion of the military-industrial superpower that is America, Christianity’s determination to ensure its supremacy at the expense of others remains undaunted. Most of this is attributable to Christianity’s evangelical nature: its followers spend billions of dollars annually on proselytization efforts around the world--far more than any other religion--with the expressed intent of draining followers away from other religious communities and into Christianity. Where the Christian church chooses to invest its time and money alone should indicate to anyone who is paying attention that it does not place a high value on religious diversity.

In order to sustain its evangelical imperative, Christianity sees itself as being able to effortlessly insert itself into non-Christian communities with only positive outcomes. After all, if Jesus Christ is the true savior for all of humankind, then it would only stand to reason that ALL communities should welcome Christianity no matter how alien its traditions, scriptures and historical viewpoints are to the communities in question. To go back to the language analogy, it would be like arguing that because all people are capable of speaking a language, not only should they be required to speak English but that they all really WANT to be required to speak English. Apparently, not much thought is given by Christians to the question that if all people and all cultures are ultimately supposed to be Christian, then why are there so many non-Christian faiths in the first place? If there is only supposed to be one god in the universe, the god described in the Christian Bible, then how come humanity has worshipped so many gods throughout the course of its collective history? Regardless of what one may say about the foundations of the Christian faith, its understanding of other religions and their place in this world is deeply flawed and hardly conducive to sustaining environments where religious plurality thrives.

One of the means of proselytization that Christianity has utilized throughout the centuries to convert non-Christian, “pagan” cultures is to disconnect their ethnic identities from the religious traditions of their ancestors and connect them to a Christian-centric worldview instead. For example, two of the major Christian holidays, Christmas and Easter, are rife with pagan symbols because as Christian apologists put it, this was done to “win over” ancient pagan peoples to the Christian faith. You’ll hear this explanation repeatedly in various discussion forums whenever questions are asked about the origins of these “traditions”, since painted eggs, decorated indoor trees and anthropomorphized rabbits clearly have little to do with the historical Christian events Christmas and Easter are designated to celebrate. It always makes me bristle to hear this explanation, to hear representatives of a conquering religion blithely discussing the symbolism of the religions they subdued as nothing more than tools in the theological equivalent of a commercial marketing campaign.

I’ve examined Christianity’s recurring tendency to “hijack” other cultures away from their ancestral faiths in greater detail in previous articles, such as “The Not-So-Great Commission” and “Evangelizing Evolution”. While I will not do so again here, I will emphasize my own concern that Christianity’s rapacious evangelical agenda has caused, and will continue to cause, incalculable damage to humanity’s spirit. Because of its steadfast conviction that it is “universal” and that it can transplant itself into any culture at any time and any place, as if it were somehow making things they way they should be, Christianity fails to recognize the damage it is inflicting upon religion as a collective human experience when it compromises the integrity of other faiths. Just as industrialization has caused countless environments across the globe to erode due to overpopulation, pollution and massive clear-cutting efforts, I believe that Christianity’s ruthless evangelization efforts that resulted in the destruction of countless religious traditions has caused a spiritual erosion of sorts around the world. Indigenous populations that are fighting for their sovereignty should not take this idea lightly when courting the Christian church’s support.

Civil Rights, Religious Wrongs

The “Christianity and sovereignty can co-exist” editorial begins with a summary of the Civil Rights Movement in America during the 1950s and ‘60s and how Native American leaders were attempting to engage Christian churches in the movement for tribal sovereignty. As the editorial states:

The Civil Rights movement was strengthened and supported by Christian churches from many denominations. Indian leaders and intellectuals, many of them Christians, believed the churches would play a significant role in the struggle for American Indian self-determination. However, the churches did not play a significant supportive role in the self-determination movement.

The editorial begins to compare how the Christian church helped the black community more than the Native American community in the area of civil rights:

In the black community, and in the Civil Rights Movement, churches were often the main way in which black people were organized into communities. Furthermore, the Civil Rights Movement was aimed at individual political and economic inclusion into American society. The Civil Rights Movement upheld central American values, goals and law. The problem was the United States was not implementing its own values and law in ways that were consistent with the Constitution or the values it expressed. Disadvantaged minority groups wanted inclusion, acceptance and entry into full U.S. citizenship. Generally, the Christian churches were supportive of the goals and values of the Civil Rights Movement and the changes in U.S. society and law that resulted. ... The movement toward American Indian self-determination, however, gained less support from the churches.

The editorial is correct that the Christian church did indeed play an important role of the Civil Rights Movement, but it completely overlooks the fact that for many black Americans, their ancestors were brought into the Christian faith under the dark shadow of slavery. Through slavery, the black community’s adherence to the non-Christian faiths of their African ancestors was largely beaten out of them--or, to be more exact, beaten, tortured, raped and murdered out of them for several consecutive generations. Christianity was a major supporter of the slave trade in its beginning, and slavery was justified in the minds of many as a way of bringing Christianity to the so-called “dark continent” of Africa. In fact, even though the African religion of Voodoo received official recognition from the Haitian government in 2003, the Catholic church, to quote The Los Angeles Times, “reacted with alarm at the moves to empower voodoo practitioners to conduct rituals with legal significance, especially baptisms, which the church contends are an exclusively Christian domain.” Haitian Voodoo adherents had to practice their faith clandestinely before such recognition due to Christianity’s violent oppression of it, an oppression that included at least three purges of Voodoo during Haiti’s early history. (In a strange twist, evangelical Christians in Haiti believed that the legal recognition of Voodoo, which gives it the same legal status as Christianity, would somehow threaten THEIR religious freedoms.)

In addition, the relationship between Christianity and black culture has not always been an amicable one even after slavery was ended. For example, some black scholars such as Hubert Henry Harrison and John G. Jackson rejected and openly criticized Christianity for its extensive participation in the slave trade and the ongoing suppression of blacks. Even the holiday of Kwanzaa, a holiday created by Dr. Maulana Karenga in 1966 to celebrate black American culture, is not above controversy within the black community. Kwanzaa is rejected by some black Christians as a challenge to Christmas, including a national campaign entitled “Merry Christmas, Not Happy Kwanzaa!” by the conservative Brotherhood Organization of a New Destiny (BOND). “Kwanzaa is a phony, wicked holiday created by an ex-con who hates God, Christians, Jews, and blacks,” warns Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, BOND’s founder. “Blacks, particularly black Christians, need to stand up for Christmas and reject Kwanzaa. If they refuse, they will be helping to stamp out the true meaning of Christmas, and allowing evil to have its way in America.”

Personally, I never could understand the relationship between Christianity and black American culture. I once heard a black Christian gospel choir singing a song with a chorus that repeatedly proclaimed “We Are God’s Chosen People” to a lively, calypso-like beat. What blew my mind about this particular song is that it was sung by people whose ancestors were enslaved by another group of people, white Christians, who thought that THEY were God’s chosen people--an assertion made by a religion derived from yet another group of people, the Jews, who thought that they were God’s chosen people. (There are even some modern conservative Christians who consider Civil War Confederate General Stonewall Jackson to be “The Black Man’s Friend” because he taught his slaves to read so they could learn their Bible lessons.) In light of such a history of multi-generational forced conversion, I can only wonder: would progressive Civil War-era Christian abolitionists have been as willing to help the southern slaves gain their freedom if the slaves would have expressed a desire to revert back to the non-Christian religious traditions of their ancestors once they were freed? Would the abolitionists have continued to help, or would they have seen granting freedom to a possible non-Christian end as encouraging Satanism? Would the late Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. have openly marched with black practitioners of Voodoo and other traditional African faiths, or would he have viewed such an action as compromising the credibility of the Civil Rights Movement?

In another instance, I read an article entitled “When My Light is Almost Gone” by Debra J. Dickerson in the December 2005 Mother Jones “God and Country” issue. The article was part of a pictorial essay of the southern black churches that were devastated by recent hurricanes. What baffled me was her repeated use of the word “apostate”, a term that suggests disloyalty, betrayal and desertion, when talking about members of the black community who have left the Christian church and criticize Christianity and its negative impact on black American history. She referred to the Christian church as the “center of black strategy and agenda” and lamented the “wedge between African Americans and God” while the article included a picture of the late Rev. Martin Luther King as the opening image, thus making the unnerving insinuation that blacks who leave the Christian church and are critical of it are somehow undermining the stability of the black community and the accomplishments of the Civil Rights Movement. “Only an apostate, someone who rejects deities and blames Christianity for inuring blacks to their oppression, would not-so-subtly (be) trying to separate blacks from the God and the church to which they’ve clung for centuries,” Dickerson wrote. Yet for blacks to attain the same level of freedom as other Americans, shouldn’t they be free to embrace other religions and ideas such as Hinduism, Islam, Buddhism, Voodoo, atheism or agnosticism? Suggesting that all American blacks should always remain indebted to and non-judgmental of the Christian church because of its connections to the Civil Rights Movement and black American history is an argument for the very opposite of true equality. (Heck, by Dickerson’s rationale, the Haitians who practice Voodoo and supported its legal recognition by the Haitian government are among the “apostates” who blame “Christianity for inuring blacks to their oppression” and are “trying to separate blacks from the God and the church to which they’ve clung for centuries.”) If Christianity becomes more involved in the tribal sovereignty effort and ends up playing a decisive role in the struggle, will we be seeing accusations of American Indians being “apostates” when they choose to abandon Christianity in favor of traditional religious beliefs and practices and criticize its role in undermining tribal religions? Would this really be a victory for the American Indian people?

Confusing Conversion with Compassion

The Indian Country editorial makes its case that Christianity can co-exist with traditional religious practices within American Indian tribes in this paragraph:

While many American Indians have converted to Christianity, most tribal communities and governments are not organized around Christian belief. When American Indians convert to Christianity, they often do not give up their identity as Indians, or ties to their community or government. In some communities, the introduction of Christianity created cultural and often political breaks with non-converts. Christianity, ultimately, demands a cultural transformation of the individual with internalization of Christian values and lifeways. Converts are often asked to give up traditional values, ceremonies and traditional ways of living; which also translate into preferences for Western or U.S.-style community and political organization. In some communities, Christianity introduced cultural and political conflict over future directions. Nevertheless, many Indian communities found ways to reconcile the inclusion of Christian groups. In some communities, Christianity is seen as one of several paths to the sacred. In these nations, some spiritual leaders practice a Christian religion, often Catholicism, as well as the Native American Church, and participate in the Sun Dance. One is only enjoined not to mix the doctrines of the various religions. Other communities respect the decisions of individuals and villages to take on Christianity or to practice the traditional spiritual path and ceremonies.

This defense of Christian Indians is seen again in the editorial’s conclusion:

Nevertheless, there are many prominent Christian Indian leaders who are devoted to American Indian issues and future welfare. Despite the official positions of the Christian churches, most American Indian Christians are strong defenders of tribal sovereignty. The churches should listen more carefully to the spiritual and worldly needs of their Indian members, and develop a rationale for the Christian defense of indigenous rights. Christianity and tribal sovereignty are reconcilable for many Indian people.

I’m sure that the editorial is correct in asserting that many tribes have found a way to accommodate Christianity within their cultures and that many Christian Indians are actively and positively involved in American Indian causes. Nevertheless, the persistent, competitive evangelical nature of the larger, collective Christian church must not be ignored. There’s a reason why this editorial is not entitled “Judaism and sovereignty can co-exist”, “Buddhism and sovereignty can co-exist”, or “Hinduism and sovereignty can co-exist”. With its endless dispatch of missionaries, translations of its Bible into every known language, and past and present cooperation with the U.S. government and industry to undermine indigenous rights, Christianity has made it utterly impossible for tribes in each of the American continents to NOT deal with the rapidly growing presence of the Christian faith over the centuries. The tribes should be congratulated for their efforts at accommodating religious diversity; in fact, I think the American Indians have been far more tolerant of Christianity than Christianity has ever been of the indigenous tribal religions (both in the Americas and around the world). In a sad, ironic twist, you could say that the American Indians have been more respectful of the freedoms recognized in the First Amendment than white Christian America ever has, and that simply should not be. The First Amendment was intended to protect the religious beliefs of minorities, not majorities, and no minority should feel compelled to tolerate a majority that has such a blatant history of disrespect and hostility towards other religious traditions.

For example, if you go to NativeWeb.org, an Internet resource for indigenous cultures around the world, click on the “Religion & Spirituality” listing towards the bottom of the page. On the “Religion & Spirituality” page, you will find many links to pages with information about traditional indigenous religious practices. But intermixed with these links are many other links to Christian evangelical groups specifically targeted to indigenous cultures. Here are a few of those groups, with their descriptions:

  • Bible Mission to Native Americans: The purpose of Bible Mission to Native Americans is to minister to the spiritual needs of our Native People in all fifty states, plus the U.S. Possession Islands in the Pacific.
  • Native American Baptist Ministries in Oklahoma: Inter-tribal website with information for Native American Baptist Ministries and Christian events in the state of Oklahoma.
  • Warriors for Christ: Discipleship Training for American Indians: Christian ministry for urban and reservation American Indians/Native, set up to encourage and strengthen spiritual growth of Native Americans through evangelism and discipleship training and to strengthen and plant Native churches on Indian reservations and urban areas throughout North America.
  • Without Reservation: Discover Native North Americans following Christ Without Reservation. Aboriginal people sharing stories of faith and culture from a First Nations perspective.
  • These groups, of which there are many outside of those listed on NativeWeb.org, are far more interested in entering tribes to add members to the Christian faith than in preserving tribes’ traditional non-Christian faiths, and they show no signs of slowing down. Some even have extensive databases that track the number and locations of “unreached” people around the world. To make matters worse, this doesn’t even begin to cover the rapidly growing Christian offshoot of Mormonism, whose practitioners were shocked when DNA evidence in the 1990s proved that the American Indians and Polynesians are not related to the Jews, a claim made by the Book of Mormon. This belief was used by Mormons since the beginnings of Mormonism as a way of persuading American Indians and Polynesians to convert to the Mormon religion. However, according to William Lobdell in “Bedrock of a Faith Is Jolted”, his February 16, 2006 article for The Los Angeles Times:

    Critics want the church to admit its mistake and apologize to millions of Native Americans it converted. Church leaders have shown no inclination to do so. Indeed, they have dismissed as heresy any suggestion that Native American genetics undermine the Mormon creed. ... Officially, the Mormon Church says that nothing in the Mormon scriptures is incompatible with DNA evidence, and that the genetic studies are being twisted to attack the church. “We would hope that church members would not simply buy into the latest DNA arguments being promulgated by those who oppose the church for some reason or other,” said Michael Otterson, a Salt Lake City-based spokesman for the Mormon church. “The truth is, the Book of Mormon will never be proved or disproved by science,” he said.

    Such competition for indigenous adherents by Christianity and its derivatives reminds me of comments made by Roy Brown in his July 1998 article, “Fundamentalism as a Destroyer of Cultures”, for the Alabama Freethinker newsletter:

    I just received a magazine covering Amerind art ... inside was a story about a Navaho who abandoned his native religion to become a born-again fundamentalist, and in the process, violated the Navaho taboo of rendering human images by carving statues in wood. And he has the effrontery to remain on the reservation. He has been so brainwashed by these fundamentalist beliefs that he fails to see that he has destroyed his own religious conviction ... Ever since the Baptists and Methodists of the nineteenth century went abroad to share their gospel, they have succeeded in destroying every culture they have come in contact with. Look at Hawaii, where the native rituals are now shown merely as tourist attractions. And observe the mission schools here in our own land, where Indians were taught that their pagan ways must be forgotten, and that their Great Spirit was purely a myth ... An African has said, “When the missionary came he had the Bible and we had the land; now we have the Bible and he has the land.” ... There was also an article in the latest Smithsonian about a woman photographer in Mexico who devoted herself to showing the decay in local traditions through their being corrupted by the Catholic Church. She felt her country ended up with a blend of both, becoming utterly ridiculous.

    Doing the Math

    Matters of religious belief and freedom of conscience aside, the mere math of the American Indian situation speaks loudly as to why the Christian church’s involvement in the tribal sovereignty movement is a bad idea. The Native American population was horribly decimated by the arrival of Europeans, through disease, forced relocation and violent conflict, resulting in a modern day Indian population that is a very small percentage of the total U.S. population. Christianity has a global membership that totals at around 2 billion followers, with majorities in most of the industrialized world; so, while Christians are the majority in America, followers of traditional American Indian beliefs are the smaller minority within an already diminutive minority. (Indigenous issues aside, to just lump Christianity together with other religions when discussing religious civil liberties is patently absurd, given its massive, disproportionate size in comparison to other faiths.) Furthermore, religions survive by passing beliefs, teachings and traditions from generation to generation. Christian efforts to force the American Indians away from their traditional religions, such as the Indian Boarding Schools, caused extensive damage to the tribes’ efforts to keep their faiths alive across the generations, deliberately stacking the deck in favor of a growing Christian presence in the tribes and a shrinking base of traditional religious practitioners. If the Christian presence continues to grow while the non-Christian traditional religions continue to shrink within the tribal cultures that have sustained them, can they survive at all in the future?

    Oddly, the Indian Country editorial does feature a paragraph that clearly identifies why there have been recent tensions between American Indian activism and the Christian church:

    When self-determination activists started to look to reservation communities for spiritual guidance, they started to view the Christian churches and their views as assimilationist. The churches and church activists withdrew from the movement, in part because of the religious revival and veneration for the traditional religions, and because the churches never seemed quite comfortable supporting American Indian political and cultural autonomy. In recent comments, Pope Benedict suggests that renewal of indigenous culture and beliefs are a step backward.

    For me, here is where the editorial’s argument falls apart. Self-determination activists regarded the Christian churches and their views as assimilationist because all available evidence proves that they ARE assimilationist. Of course, there are exceptions to the rule, and there are many tolerant, open-minded Christians all over the world; but as an institution, the Christian church sees its supremacy over other religions as both deserved and inevitable. For example, the comments of Pope Benedict that are referred to in the editorial are those that were said during his appearance in Brazil last May. “Christ is the savior for whom they were silently longing,” Benedict said about the indigenous, pre-Columbian people of Latin America. He went on to say that, “In effect, the proclamation of Jesus and of his Gospel did not at any point involve an alienation of the pre-Columbus cultures, nor was it the imposition of a foreign culture.” Also, Benedict did not SUGGEST that the renewal of pre-Christian religious beliefs among the indigenous people would be a step backwards, he ACTUALLY SAID that it would be a step backwards. Benedict’s assumptions, like the assumptions of many Christians like him, verify my analysis of Christian thinking in “Living in a Missionary World”:

    It is as if Christ’s Great Commission--his command to his followers to spread the faith in him to all corners of the world--has permeated every aspect of Western thinking, no matter how secular some say it has become. Mind you, this does not make very citizen of the Western world (let alone every Christian) a dedicated evangelist, but it does encourage an atmosphere of acceptance (or at least indifference) when it comes to Christian evangelism activity, regardless of what that activity may be, where and when it takes place, and to whom it is done. Furthermore, such deliberate exclusion of non-Christian, non-monotheistic faiths indirectly suggests that when any culture is given the choice of either following Jesus Christ or following the non-Christian faith of its ancestors, it will always choose Christ. In other words, the suggestion is that everyone innately WANTS to be a Christian, even if he or she is not consciously aware of such desire, or that everyone is ultimately destined to become a Christian. Then again, this belief must be maintained to accept Christianity’s assertion that it is “universal” for the entire human race. While this doesn’t explain the ongoing existence of other religions such as Judaism or Hinduism and overlooks situations of indigenous resistance to encroaching Christian interests, such an assumption is necessary to accept the pro-Christian view of world history. In this history, there is only one true, monotheistic religion that is the pinnacle of morality and progress, and all other religions are nothing but exercises in empty superstition, chronic ignorance, questionable sanity, and/or remorseless evil. This kind of interpretation of history runs parallel to Christian Creationism itself, as if all of human history revolves around the Christian Bible’s view of history.

    Benedict’s remarks took me back to another time when his predecessor, Pope John Paul II, visited Mexico in 2002. As part of that visit, John Paul II beatified Juan Bautista and Jacinto de los Angeles, two Zapotec Indians who died at the hands of their fellow villagers as “martyrs” for the Catholic Church in September 1700. What the Catholic Church does not readily admit is that Bautista and de los Angeles were informers working for the Spanish colonial church to help stamp out non-Christian religious practices. These Indians were killed by the villagers in retaliation for telling colonial police about an Indian religious ceremony that the police then raided. In response to the deaths of Bautista and de los Angeles, Christian officials decapitated and quartered 15 men whose body parts were then staked by the roadside as a warning.

    John Paul II also canonized Juan Diego, the Indian to whom the Virgin of Guadelupe revealed herself in 1531, making him the first Indian saint. Naturally, this canonization overlooks the fact that there is no solid evidence that Diego ever existed, or that the so-called “Guadelupe miracle” was in reality a ploy to substitute a Catholic icon for the Aztec goddess Tonantzin Koatlikwe. Think about it: the word “Guadelupe” is in reference to the Guadelupe River in Spain, where a wooden image of a small, brown-skinned woman (probably carved by one of the Moors who were occupying Spain) was found by a Catholic Spaniard in the 13th century. This image became “Our lady of Guadelupe”, a “sign” from the Christian god of Spain’s victory over the Moors. After Columbus arrived in the Americas, the king and queen of Spain declared the Virgin to be “protector of the Indians,” since their skin color was similar to that of the Guadelupe image. Isn’t it more than a little suspect that the Virgin Mary would appear to an Indian in a fashion that happened to fit the one chosen for the Indians by the king and queen of Spain and was avidly worshipped by Hernan Cortes, one of the brutal conquerors of New World who made the Virgin of Guadelupe part of his military banner?

    What I found particularly jarring in reading articles about these papal visits is how article after article framed the issue in terms of competition--not competition between pre-Columbian indigenous religions and Christianity, but Christianity competing with MORE Christianity. Both the 2002 and 2007 papal visits were intended to stem the Catholic Church’s growing losses of followers to charismatic Protestantism in both Central and South America. The Catholic Church’s competition with Protestant evangelists is nothing new, and it did become more noticeable to me as I read about these papal visits and as I was doing research last year for my article on the movie Apocalypto. (Pope Benedict just recently approved the release of a document that emphasizes the “universal primacy” of the Roman Catholic Church and that other Christian denominations are not true churches.) Nevertheless, religion should ideally be about an individual’s expression of spiritual belief and devotion within the context of a particular religious tradition/community. To see terms such as “competition” and “defection” in articles about the relationship between Catholicism and Protestantism (or Christianity and any other faith) suggests a process that is far more bureaucratic, economic and political than spiritual--or, for that matter, spiritually healthy. Yet regardless of whether Catholicism or Protestantism succeeds in establishing a majority, the non-Christian faiths in the region lose. Sadly, like John Paul II and Benedict, the articles about the visits largely ignore the blood-drenched genocidal colonial history behind the Catholic Church’s ill-gotten gains and what such outcomes mean to religious freedom and diversity.

    As a result of such intra-Christian competition, both popes beatified and canonized Indians to increase Catholicism’s appeal to the indigenous communities in Latin America, even though such acts are little more than religious marketing campaigns akin to the Christmas trees and Easter eggs I referred to in the beginning of this article. Yet no matter how transparently self-serving these tactics are, they still work. Here is an excerpt from “Bolstering Faith of the Indians,” an article written by Frank Bruni and Ginger Thompson that ran in the August 1, 2002 edition of The New York Times, with emphasis added:

    During a lavishly staged Mass that mingled flourishes from the ancient Aztecs with traditional hymns, Pope John Paul II made an emphatic appeal today to the indigenous people who have abandoned the Roman Catholic Church and presented them with a saint they could call their own. As the pope canonized Juan Diego, an Indian convert to Catholicism in the 16th century, Indians in feathered headdresses blew conch shells and danced through the Basilica of Guadalupe here in celebration of what the pope called “the gift of the first indigenous saint of the American continent.” ... “Christ’s message, through his mother, took up the central elements of the indigenous culture, purified them and gave them the definitive sense of salvation,” the pope said in Spanish, according to the official Vatican translation of his remarks. The pope added that Juan Diego “facilitated the fruitful meeting of two worlds” in the wake of the conquest of Mexico by Catholic Spaniards and “became the catalyst for the new Mexican identity.” ... “It gives me satisfaction to know that Juan Diego is now equal to all the other saints in our church,” said Gloria Estela Gonzalez, a Purepecha Indian from central Mexico. “He shows that humble and simple people like us have a place at the altar.”

    This is the most chilling aspect of Christianity’s colonial history. The Christian church willingly and violently persecutes a population for its religious beliefs and then makes token acts of contrition for such actions once it secures a majority of followers within the population, to suggest some kind of “equality” within the ranks of the church. This can even reach the point where, as this example demonstrates, followers dress in traditional pre-Christian drag as a facade of mutual tolerance. (Such duplicity is more suggestive of Stockholm syndrome than genuine religious faith.) Indeed, it is a tragedy for all when true religious equality is supplanted by this warped and deceitful alternative, which supports forced conversions of entire cultures and demands that minorities must have a member achieve sainthood to receive better recognition from an international religion such as the Catholic Church. Yet it has happened in Latin America and it has happened within the black community of the U.S. Does the indigenous community in North America want it to happen in their tribes as well?

    Ironically, even though the indigenous populations of Central and South America were converted to Catholicism by the Spanish, membership in the Catholic Church in modern-day Spain is dwindling. The rate of recent departures among the Spanish has reached a point where the bishops have even gone to court to stop them from leaving.

    Sovereignty of the Tribe, Freedom of the Spirit

    As I said before, not all Christians are harshly opposed to other religions or are obsessed with ensuring Christianity’s dominion over all by whatever means necessary. Most of my family and friends are Christians. They are not raving, violent fanatics, they don’t feel compelled to intrude on the religious practices of other faiths, and they are just as bothered by the Christian Right’s recent ascendancy in American politics as I am. Many of these Christians would read what I’m writing now and argue against the actions taken by aggressive, intolerant Christian evangelists, saying that Jesus Christ himself would deplore such behavior. But as I have articulated in my recent articles, I’ve grown up living in a culture that far too often looks away from Christianity’s crimes, crimes committed on scales that no other religion could achieve simply because of its insatiable imperative to convert and its international reach. These crimes and their lasting, damaging impact to other faiths and cultures should not be disregarded and Christianity should not be left unaccountable simply because it is a majority religion or can sustain tolerant, progressive followers as part of its total membership.

    I can understand the Native American community’s plea with the Christian church for support. Christianity is the majority religion in the U.S., and thus it wields considerable social, political and economic clout. But the closing comments in the Indian Country editorial, that “In practice, tribal sovereignty does not exclude Christian beliefs or members” and that “Christian belief should not exclude the rights and values of indigenous peoples”, emphasize the very problem with relying on the Christian church when seeking control of one’s political destiny. True, Christian beliefs SHOULDN’T exclude the rights and values of indigenous peoples, but the Christian church’s history, both past and present, unmistakably shows otherwise. It must never be forgotten that the Christian church has been actively involved with the suppression of traditional Indian religious practices since its arrival in the Americas, in addition to the undermining of indigenous non-Christian religions around the world throughout the centuries. On the basis of its history, I cannot imagine the Christian church as a united institution supporting any endeavor where it cannot assume a lasting dominance. I would argue that the Christian church will remain withdrawn from the American Indian tribal sovereignty movement until it can be certain that it can secure a permanent majority of believers within the American Indian community. As long as traditional non-Christian religious beliefs and practices remain a viable choice among the American Indians, along with a possibility of their resurgence at the expense of Christian supremacy, the Christian church as a whole will not regard the tribal sovereignty of the American Indians as a worthwhile investment, no matter how morally justified such support would be.

    True tribal sovereignty will encourage the survival of traditional, non-Christian religious beliefs. It should not completely exclude Christianity or other religions, but it should foster an atmosphere of religious tolerance on the terms that best fit the tribes and NOT the Christian church. Traditional tribal religions are unique expressions of spiritual wisdom that are to be cherished and protected, particularly because these minority religions are sorely misunderstood and unappreciated by the general American public and they have no stable, safe haven outside of the tribes--as opposed to Christianity, which is in abundance. The teachings, rituals and holy lands recognized by such traditional beliefs are anchored on this continent and nowhere else; if such practices and beliefs are lost here, they are lost forever. As history proves (such as in Latin America), letting a hyper-competitive, evangelical religion such as Christianity play an integral role in the tribes’ campaign for sovereignty will most likely put the survival of traditional tribal religions at risk. If true freedom is to be attained, the tribes must not allow Christianity and its legions of well-funded, overzealous missionaries, both Catholic and Protestant, to exploit the political weaknesses of the American Indian community to further compromise the survival of the traditional religions.

    In a larger context, it will be a major victory for religious freedom for indigenous and minority religions everywhere if the American Indians are successful in achieving sovereignty without the help of the Christian church. Minorities should not have to look to another religion for approval and support when it comes to establishing their sovereignty. Doing otherwise suggests that the First Amendment is not a valid, sustainable political concept, that civil rights and political autonomy of a minority group mean nothing if the majority religion does recognize and support such efforts. While establishing tribal sovereignty without the support of the Christian church will be difficult, it will be worthwhile in the long run for both American Indians and others who seek to protect their religious freedoms from an intolerant majority.

    Labels:




    Home | Syndicate this site (XML) | Guestbook | Blogger
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies. Comments, posts, stories, and all other content are owned by the authors.
    Everything else © 2005 The Conversion Agenda